The Blog

Most men spend more time choosing a sandwich than they do choosing their underwear. It’s bought in multipacks, replaced when it wears out, and given almost no thought beyond size and colour. The label gets a glance at best, usually just to confirm it goes in the wash at 40 degrees.

That label, however, contains more information than most people realise. And what it doesn’t say is often just as revealing as what it does.

The Fabric Composition: Reading Between the Lines

The fabric composition is listed on every garment label by law. In the UK, textile products must display the fibre content by percentage in descending order. This sounds straightforward. In practice, it requires some interpretation.

The headline figure is usually cotton. “80% cotton” sounds reassuring. It suggests a natural, breathable product. What it doesn’t tell you is what the remaining 20% is, or why it’s there. That 20% might be elastane for stretch, nylon for durability, or polyester to reduce cost. Each of these synthetic fibres behaves differently against the skin and carries different environmental implications.

Some brands list their fibre content accurately but present it in a way that emphasises the natural component. “Cotton rich” is a phrase with no regulatory definition. It could mean 51% cotton. It could mean 95% cotton. Without the actual percentages, it tells you nothing useful.

The only fabric composition worth trusting completely is one that reads 100% cotton, or 100% of any named natural fibre. Anything else requires you to look at the full breakdown and understand what each component contributes.

What the Synthetic Fibres Are Actually Doing There

Synthetic fibres don’t appear in underwear by accident. Each one serves a specific purpose for the manufacturer, though that purpose doesn’t always align with your interests as the wearer.

Elastane, also sold under the brand names Lycra and Spandex, adds stretch. A small percentage gives a garment significant flexibility and helps it retain its shape after washing. For fitted styles like briefs and trunks, elastane is almost universal. In looser styles like boxer shorts, it’s less necessary but still commonly used because it simplifies the pattern cutting process.

Nylon is added primarily for durability and abrasion resistance. It makes fabric less likely to pill or wear thin at points of friction. It also gives fabric a smooth surface feel that many consumers associate with quality, particularly when the garment is new. The problem is that nylon doesn’t breathe. It traps heat and moisture against the skin, which is the opposite of what underwear should do.

Polyester reduces cost. It’s cheaper than cotton, easy to process, and blends well with natural fibres without dramatically changing the surface appearance of the fabric. It also doesn’t breathe, ages poorly, and sheds microplastics with every wash.

Modal and Tencel are semi-synthetic fibres derived from wood pulp. They’re softer than most synthetics and more breathable than nylon or polyester, but they’re still processed fibres rather than natural ones. They appear in premium underwear ranges as an alternative to cotton rather than a complement to it. Whether they represent a meaningful improvement over quality cotton is genuinely debatable.

The Waistband Problem

The waistband is the component of men’s underwear that receives the least attention on labels and the most attention from wearers when something goes wrong.

Most waistbands contain a significant proportion of synthetic fibres regardless of what the main fabric is made from. A pair of underwear labelled 95% cotton might have a waistband that is predominantly elastane and nylon. The label is technically accurate because it reflects the average composition of the whole garment, but the component in contact with your skin for the longest periods each day could be primarily synthetic.

The alternative is a natural rubber elastic waistband. Natural rubber is derived from the rubber tree, a genuinely natural material that provides stretch without synthetic content. It’s more expensive than synthetic elastic and less commonly used, but it’s the choice that makes sense in underwear designed around what’s best for the wearer rather than what’s cheapest to produce.

The Care Label: More Information Than You’re Using

The care label tells you how to wash a garment, but it also tells you something about how the manufacturer expects it to age. A care label that recommends cold wash only and air drying is telling you that the fabric is sensitive to heat, which often indicates a higher proportion of synthetic content or a delicate natural fibre that hasn’t been treated for durability.

A care label that permits machine washing at 30 or 40 degrees and tumble drying suggests a more robust construction. For everyday underwear, robustness matters. You’re washing these garments regularly for years. The care instructions tell you whether the manufacturer has designed for that reality.

Cotton underwear washed at 30 degrees and air dried or dried flat will maintain its shape, colour, and feel significantly longer than the same garment washed hot and tumble dried repeatedly. This isn’t a quirk of organic cotton specifically. It applies to all cotton. Heat breaks down natural fibres faster than cool water does.

Country of Origin: What It Does and Doesn’t Tell You

The country of manufacture appears on most garment labels, though the rules around this are less straightforward than they might seem. A garment labelled “Made in the UK” was assembled in the UK, but the fabric, thread, and other components may have originated elsewhere.

This isn’t necessarily a problem. Global supply chains are a reality of modern manufacturing. What matters is whether a brand can tell you where their materials come from and verify the conditions under which they were produced. Country of origin is a starting point for that conversation, not a complete answer.

UK manufacturing does carry some meaningful implications. UK factories are subject to UK employment law, which sets minimum wage, working hours, and health and safety standards that are among the strongest in the world. A garment made in the UK is more likely to have been produced under fair conditions than one made in a country with weaker labour protections, though this is a generalisation rather than a guarantee.

For small brands manufacturing in the UK, the country of origin claim also typically reflects a closer relationship between the brand and the factory than is possible with overseas mass production. When a designer is working with a small UK factory, they tend to know exactly how their garments are made and by whom.

Certification Marks: The Ones Worth Looking For

Beyond the mandatory label information, voluntary certification marks tell you something about what a brand has chosen to verify independently.

GOTS, the Global Organic Textile Standard, is the most comprehensive certification for organic textiles, covering farming, processing, and manufacturing across the entire supply chain. It’s independently audited and publicly verifiable.

OEKO-TEX Standard 100 certifies that a finished product has been tested and found free from harmful substances. It doesn’t cover the farming or social aspects of production but is a meaningful assurance about the safety of the finished garment for the wearer.

The Soil Association organic certification covers cotton farming to a high standard in the UK context. Fair Trade certification focuses on the social and economic conditions of production.

Any of these marks represents a real commitment that costs time and money to maintain. Their presence on a label is a more reliable signal than any marketing language a brand might use to describe their products.

The Language of Greenwashing

Certain words and phrases on clothing labels and marketing materials have become so commonly misused that they’ve lost most of their meaning. It’s worth knowing which ones to treat with scepticism.

“Sustainable” has no regulatory definition in fashion. Any brand can use it to describe any product without meeting any standard.

“Eco-friendly” is similarly unregulated. It describes an intention rather than a verified outcome.

“Natural” technically applies to any fibre derived from a natural source, including conventional cotton grown with heavy pesticide use. It says nothing about how that natural fibre was processed or what it was combined with.

“Organic” without certification is a claim, not a fact. As discussed, the word has no legal protection in fashion without an accompanying certification mark.

“Recycled” is more meaningful than the above because it describes a verifiable characteristic of the material. However, recycled synthetic fibres still shed microplastics and still don’t breathe as well as natural fibres. Recycled is better than virgin synthetic, but it’s not the same as natural.

The standard worth applying to any sustainability claim is simple: can the brand tell you where their materials come from and who certified them? A brand that sources GOTS certified organic cotton from a verified supplier can point you to that supplier and their certification. That’s a meaningful answer. A brand that uses the word organic without being able to name their source or their supplier’s certification is giving you nothing verifiable at all.

What Good Underwear Actually Looks Like on a Label

Putting all of this together, here’s what a genuinely well made pair of men’s underwear looks like from a label perspective.

Fabric composition: 100% cotton, ideally with an organic certification such as GOTS. No nylon, no polyester, no elastane in the main fabric.

Waistband: natural rubber elastic rather than synthetic. This won’t always appear explicitly on the label but should be available from the brand on request or listed in the product description.

Care: washable at 30 degrees, best air dried or dried flat. Simple instructions that reflect a natural fibre construction.

Country of origin: ideally domestic or from a country where you can verify the manufacturing conditions.

Certification marks: GOTS, OEKO-TEX, Soil Association, or Fair Trade, any of which represent independently verified claims rather than marketing language.

At Rolf Skeldon our men’s cotton poplin boxer shorts are made from 100% cotton poplin with no hidden synthetics, a natural rubber elastic waistband, and no components your skin doesn’t need. The white version carries full GOTS organic certification. Every pair is made here in the UK, with complete transparency on materials and construction.

The label tells you what’s in a garment. What you do with that information is up to you.